Art Home | ARTH Home | ARTH Courses | ARTH 200 | Google Maps | ARTH Links | Glossary
ARTH 200 Assignments
Thursday, January 16: Introduction. Looking will be a major issue in this course. It is not just how we look, but how the images look at us. Early in the semester we will be looking at early Renaissance paintings of images of women like Ghirlandaio's painting of Giovanna Tournabuoni: . Here the woman is an object to be looked at. Notice that her beauty is largely a product of culture. Her "natural" beauty has been transformed by culture. Consider the radical difference to Leonardo's Mona Lisa: . The following is a painting by the Flemish 17th century artist, Peter Paul Rubens. It is a portrait of his wife, Isabella Brant: What is your response to this painting? For us with modern advertising, this figure is almost a cliché, but in historical context, the potency of the way Isabella looks is very powerful. While she still has the clothing and symbols of status, Rubens puts more emphasis on Isabella's sensuality. Rubens wants the viewer to imagine touching her. Consider the role you play in looking at the painting.
Tuesday, January 21: review web-page entitled First Assignments. As indicated, include in your journals your "denotative" and "connotative" readings of the Hopper painting. E-mail me your entries.
Thursday, January 23: respond to the assignment for this date included on the First Assignments web page.
Tuesday, January 28: bring a copy of your draft of your first paper to class to be workshopped. The work of Isabel Bishop presents an interesting alternative to the vision of the working woman of Hopper. Bishop's paintings focus on young female office workers. Consider the contrast to Hopper to the images on the page dedicated to Bishop's work. I encourage you to read the essay by Ellen Wiley Todd, "The Question of Difference: Isabel Bishop's Deferential Office Girls."
We will be examining contemporary images of women at work. Here I want to draw upon images from advertising. See the page entitled Women at Work presents a few examples I have collected. Review them in advance of the class, and be prepared to identify the codes you see in operation in these. Record your responses in your journals
Thursday, January 30: First papers are due. Review the material included on the page entitled The Social Construction of Gender. From this page select a quotation that was meaningful to you or that you did not understand or that you disagree with. Write this quotation in your journal, and write a response to it. Be prepared to share your quotation in class on Thursday.
Tuesday, February 4: Review the page entitled [Female] Nude. Focus on the comparison of the Venus of Willendorf to the Venus de Milo (aka Aphrodite of Melos). Consider the relevance of the quotations at the outset of the page to your understanding of the comparison.
Consider the work of Anna Utopia Giordano in her Venus Project in which she has Photoshopped some of the traditional images of Venus to make her conform to our ideal.
Introduce Second Paper Assignment.
Thursday, February 6: Review the page entitled From Snake Goddess to Medusa. Much of the class will be focused on a comparison of the figure of the so-called Snake Goddess from Minoan culture of the second millenium to the mythological figure of Medusa that was represented in Greek art especially beginning in the seventh century and into the Archaic period. I have asked you to respond to these images in your journals.
Tuesday, February 11: bring in sample advertisements to workshop for your Second Paper Assignment. We will review page of Sample Advertisements to brainstorm approaches to the paper. Look at the web page entitled Looking and the Gaze.
Thursday, February 13: Probably no monument is more symbolic of western culture as the Parthenon constructed between 447-432 BCE. It was created as a monument to Athena and Athens' position in the world. I want to consider it from the perspective of the construction of gender. Review the web page I have created on Gender Construction and the Parthenon. To give a context for construction of gender in Archaic and Classical Art review the web pages I have titled The Classical Body and the Female Figure in Archaic and Classical Greek Art.
This ad appeared in 1993 in The New York Times. It celebrated the opening of a major exhibition entitled The Greek Miracle at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The head is from a statue known as the Kritios Boy. This work was made about 480 BCE, and is seen to mark the break between the Archaic and Early Classical periods of Greek art. Read the text accompanying the ad and respond to it in your journal.
Tuesday, February 25: bring in a draft of your Second Paper Assignment.
We will return to our discussion of gender construction in Greek art. A pivotal moment occurred in the 4th century BCE which saw the creation by the artist Praxiteles of his Aphrodite of Knidos. This can be understood to be the first monumental nude female sculpture in Greek art. Read the excerpts included on the webpage entitled The Aphrodite of Knidos and the Invention of the Female Nude in Greek Art. Compare and contrast the conception of the nude female to the nude male figure illustrated by the following comparison:
Thursday, February 27: Deadline for submitting your Second Paper Assignment.
I want to turn to a consideration of late Medieval and Renaissance culture. I want to apply the idea of reading images from the perspective social codes to an important monument of early fifteenth century French culture, the Trés riches heures. On the linked page you will find a discussion of several of the calendar illustrations in this manuscript. For our purposes I want to pay particular attention to the January, February, April, and May images. Look at these images from the perspective of social codes. Pay attention particularly to the question of gender and social class.
Thursday, March 6: Any consideration of Northern Renaissance art needs to take into consideration Jan Van Eyck's so-called Arnolfini Wedding Portrait. While scholars debate about whether this is a wedding portrait or not, there is no question that the relationship of the man (Giovanni Arnolfini, an Italian merchant active in the Netherlands) and woman (Giovanna Cenami, a daughter of prominent, Italian merchant family also active in Northern Europe) is central to the content of the painting. Review the webpage I have created for the Arnolfini Wedding Portrait. A significant issue in the painting is the question of the social role of women and marriage as an institution in the fifteenth century. To give you some historical context read the page entitled Women in Renaissance Florence. For more information on the social standing of Jan Van Eyck, review the page focused on Van Eyck as a Court Painter that I have developed for my Northern Renaissance Art class.
Tuesday, March 11: continuation of our discussion of the Arnolfini Wedding Portrait.
Thursday, March 13: We will shift our focus from northern Europe to Italy. I want to explore the gender construction of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa, but to do this it is important to understand the social and artistic contexts for the painting in order to appreciate the innovations in Leonardo's painting. Today's class will examine these contexts. Read the excerpts from the essay by Dale Kent "Women in Renaissance Florence" which is included in the exhibition catalog entitled: Virtue and Beauty. Also read the excerpts from Patricia Simons's article "Women in Frames: The Gaze, the Eye, the Profile in Renaissance Portraiture."
Tuesday, March 18: Deadline for submitting ideas for topics for the Third Paper Assignment.
Thursday, March 27: bring in a draft of your Third Paper Assignment to be workshopped.
Tuesday, April 8: deadline for submitting Third Paper Assignment.